Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 4266102" data-attributes="member: 277">as i said in another response, this is just one of several covers. And inside the magazine features women of varied ages, sizes and (for at least one person) without all limbs. Is it virtue signaling to show a diverse (varied) group of body types or simply a reflection of the readership at large? What is more relatable, this lady being shown to look glamorous or a tiny, airbrushed supermodel? While it might have 'traditionally' been one thing, it doesn't mean it has to be that every year. One year they literally painted on all the swimsuits if i remember right. Does not doing that here break some tradition that must be respected? Or is it simply trying to bring variation to a theme done yearly?</blockquote>