Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cjjtulsa" data-source="post: 2201972" data-attributes="member: 6146">I&#039;ve posted inconsistencies from those investigating it on this forum numerous times.&nbsp; So - just a few:Two men reported by witnesses running past the gym; two men plainly seen on helicopter camera footage running by the gym.&nbsp; Two men detained in the woods behind the gym.&nbsp; No clear explanation of them, only random passing blurbs in news reports (including &quot;off duty SWAT officer from another jurisdiction&quot;, who just happened to be dicking around in the woods on that morning?).&nbsp; Yet the single shooter narrative is etched in stone.Responding LEO on dispatch recordings - at the scene of Lanza&#039;s body - reporting &quot;long rifle(s?) and shotgun&quot;, yet the only long gun in the official story is an AR15, and the only shotgun was an S12 pulled from the trunk of the car.&nbsp; What about the shotgun at the scene of Lanza&#039;s body?&nbsp; Hard to tell, but did the officer say &quot;rifles&quot; as in plural?&nbsp; Or was he just confused, and somehow confused one AR15 with multiple long guns?&nbsp; Helicopter footage of Honda in front of school with left and right side doors open, and (looks like) two black sweatshirts on the ground; Lanza may have needed to open the passenger door to retrieve the rifle, but why the discarded sweatshirts - as in, more than one?&nbsp; And why in some other aerial pics were the sweatshirts missing?&nbsp; From a witness (Barbara Sibly, interviewed by Katie Couric):&quot;but when I got out of the car and started walking towards the building I noticed a car in the drop off area in front of the entrance like a black hatchback had all the doors open and like black sweat shirts strewn around it and again I thought, that’s really odd you don’t usually see that at the school.&quot;Notice, she said &quot;sweat shirts&quot;.&nbsp; Two guys running past the gym.&nbsp; &quot;Long rifle (or rifles) and shotgun&quot;.Security camera footage not released, and is something that would put the shingle shooter theory to rest - right or wrong - for good.&nbsp; Now, introducing legislation that would ban the public from seeing certain photographs, hearing recordings, as well as &quot;possibly other evidence&quot;, and only as concerns this one case?&nbsp; This passes the smell test to most?&nbsp; Why?I could go on and on; this isn&#039;t some UFO nonsense - there is plenty that doesn&#039;t add up.&nbsp; It was a horrible murder scene, but more than one person pulled this off, as far as I&#039;m concerned.&nbsp; And the accomplices are being covered up.&nbsp; Couple this with Obama&#039;s alleged remark to Sarah Brady about working &quot;under the radar&quot; as concerns gun control, the Aurora shooting several months before Newtown, and then this, with all of it&#039;s inconsistencies - and few question it?&nbsp; I don&#039;t buy it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cjjtulsa, post: 2201972, member: 6146"] I've posted inconsistencies from those investigating it on this forum numerous times. So - just a few: Two men reported by witnesses running past the gym; two men plainly seen on helicopter camera footage running by the gym. Two men detained in the woods behind the gym. No clear explanation of them, only random passing blurbs in news reports (including "off duty SWAT officer from another jurisdiction", who just happened to be dicking around in the woods on that morning?). Yet the single shooter narrative is etched in stone. Responding LEO on dispatch recordings - at the scene of Lanza's body - reporting "long rifle(s?) and shotgun", yet the only long gun in the official story is an AR15, and the only shotgun was an S12 pulled from the trunk of the car. What about the shotgun at the scene of Lanza's body? Hard to tell, but did the officer say "rifles" as in plural? Or was he just confused, and somehow confused one AR15 with multiple long guns? Helicopter footage of Honda in front of school with left and right side doors open, and (looks like) two black sweatshirts on the ground; Lanza may have needed to open the passenger door to retrieve the rifle, but why the discarded sweatshirts - as in, more than one? And why in some other aerial pics were the sweatshirts missing? From a witness (Barbara Sibly, interviewed by Katie Couric): "but when I got out of the car and started walking towards the building I noticed a car in the drop off area in front of the entrance like a black hatchback had all the doors open and like black sweat shirts strewn around it and again I thought, that’s really odd you don’t usually see that at the school." Notice, she said "sweat shirts". Two guys running past the gym. "Long rifle (or rifles) and shotgun". Security camera footage not released, and is something that would put the shingle shooter theory to rest - right or wrong - for good. Now, introducing legislation that would ban the public from seeing certain photographs, hearing recordings, as well as "possibly other evidence", and only as concerns this one case? This passes the smell test to most? Why? I could go on and on; this isn't some UFO nonsense - there is plenty that doesn't add up. It was a horrible murder scene, but more than one person pulled this off, as far as I'm concerned. And the accomplices are being covered up. Couple this with Obama's alleged remark to Sarah Brady about working "under the radar" as concerns gun control, the Aurora shooting several months before Newtown, and then this, with all of it's inconsistencies - and few question it? I don't buy it. [/QUOTE]

Verification