Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2202021" data-attributes="member: 1132">You&#039;re the one that says the initial reporting doesn&#039;t jive with the revised assessment of what happened, or what you saw on TV. Well why not create a conspiracy on tornado inconsistencies? I don&#039;t believe a word the Obama admoinistration says on F&amp;F, Benghazi, the AP surveillance or IRS audits. I don&#039;t have any proof either, so unless someone comes up with a smoking gun, they&#039;re going to get away with it. Wthout said evidence, no one should go to jail. That does not make me believe that something fishy happened in podunk Conneticut because there&#039;s no evidence AND no motive. If you feel different, have at it. Just don&#039;t look at the rest of us like we&#039;re crazy because we don&#039;t agre with you. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2202021, member: 1132"] You're the one that says the initial reporting doesn't jive with the revised assessment of what happened, or what you saw on TV. Well why not create a conspiracy on tornado inconsistencies? I don't believe a word the Obama admoinistration says on F&F, Benghazi, the AP surveillance or IRS audits. I don't have any proof either, so unless someone comes up with a smoking gun, they're going to get away with it. Wthout said evidence, no one should go to jail. That does not make me believe that something fishy happened in podunk Conneticut because there's no evidence AND no motive. If you feel different, have at it. Just don't look at the rest of us like we're crazy because we don't agre with you. :( [/QUOTE]

Verification