Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cjjtulsa" data-source="post: 2202663" data-attributes="member: 6146">No.&nbsp; But when there&#039;s evidence that doesn&#039;t quite add up, evidence which points to something other than what we&#039;re told, evidence that is withheld from the public (even spurring legislation just for this case to withhold it from the public), when there&#039;s threats of disseminating any information other than what the &quot;authorities&quot; (think about that word for a minute) tell us we can, else risk prosecution - logic dictates that the event needs much, much more scrutiny.&nbsp; And when the result of the event is the possible destruction of one of our Constitutional rights, and yet people are quick to just dismiss it as what those that stand to benefit from the event tell us it was, I have a problem with that.&nbsp;&nbsp; Equating the logical skepticism over something like Sandy Hook to thinking the Tornadoes last week were &quot;government conspiracies&quot; is only a form of misdirection because someone doesn&#039;t have a solid argument.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cjjtulsa, post: 2202663, member: 6146"] No. But when there's evidence that doesn't quite add up, evidence which points to something other than what we're told, evidence that is withheld from the public (even spurring legislation just for this case to withhold it from the public), when there's threats of disseminating any information other than what the "authorities" (think about that word for a minute) tell us we can, else risk prosecution - logic dictates that the event needs much, much more scrutiny. And when the result of the event is the possible destruction of one of our Constitutional rights, and yet people are quick to just dismiss it as what those that stand to benefit from the event tell us it was, I have a problem with that. Equating the logical skepticism over something like Sandy Hook to thinking the Tornadoes last week were "government conspiracies" is only a form of misdirection because someone doesn't have a solid argument. [/QUOTE]

Verification