No concealed weapon sign Access Urgent Care in

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jedabug92

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
129
Location
Mustang
Yup, prosecute to the full extent, misdemeanor trespassing, $75. And I totally understand the officer thing. Had one patrol officer tell me that its illegal to have a loaded handgun in your car because the SDA law doesn't apply to your vehicle, just when you are walking around in a public place that you have a right to be....
.....what the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Sent via carrier pigeon
 

rawhide

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,304
Location
Lincoln Co.
In Yukon on mustang & Reno...
Their sign says no conceal carry weapons by city ordinance...
Are they referring to the business owners right to prohibit or something else I'm not aware of?
If Yukon passed such an ordinance, and it may have, Yukon is in violation of state law. OK2A recently had a sign removed in an Edmond park stating it is illegal to carry "weapons."
 

tRidiot

Perpetually dissatisfied
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
12,712
Location
Bartlesville
If Yukon passed such an ordinance, and it may have, Yukon is in violation of state law. OK2A recently had a sign removed in an Edmond park stating it is illegal to carry "weapons."

Correct - any ordinance they (or any other city) passes is automatically null and void due to state preemption.
 

caojyn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
8,186
Reaction score
1,496
Location
Edmond
Can you elaborate please?
Heien vs NC
Ruled 8-1
The Heien opinion holds that the police can act “reasonably” even if they don’t know the criminal law but then says that no private party can act “reasonably” if he or she makes the same mistake. That dichotomy implies that the police can break the law, but members of the public cannot, a double standard that is offensive to longstanding American values.
 

chuter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
5,269
Reaction score
7,642
Location
over yonder
Heien vs NC
Ruled 8-1
The Heien opinion holds that the police can act “reasonably” even if they don’t know the criminal law but then says that no private party can act “reasonably” if he or she makes the same mistake. That dichotomy implies that the police can break the law, but members of the public cannot, a double standard that is offensive to longstanding American values.

Did not know that, thanks.
 

Dave70968

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
6,676
Reaction score
4,619
Location
Norman
Heien vs NC
Ruled 8-1
The Heien opinion holds that the police can act “reasonably” even if they don’t know the criminal law but then says that no private party can act “reasonably” if he or she makes the same mistake. That dichotomy implies that the police can break the law, but members of the public cannot, a double standard that is offensive to longstanding American values.
Thanks. I was on the road all day.

A little more detail: the cop pulled a citizen over for something that wasn't illegal. SCOTUS upheld the stop on the grounds that his mistaken belief was "reasonable." In other words, official ignorance now constitutes probable cause.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom