Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Nobel Peace Prize
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 1849693" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>Parks - Not sure what you are saying is "Wrong!". Please read my post carefully - MoBoost was correct that in that sentence snip that is being replayed repeatedly the President was referring to the roads, etc. not to their businesses per se. BUT (and here's the key point I was trying to make) his overall intent was to justify an ever increasing tax burden as "owed by right" with no logical limits or historical precedent necessary In fact, he constantly wishes to avoid a discussion of what are the [proper limits of government and the President makes quite clear that in the economic realm he believes whatever the citizenry is "allowed" to keep is largesse from government not really their own hard-earned income/wealth.</p><p></p><p>I doubt very much that the President's campaign wants us to take away what I posted as his campaign message.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 1849693, member: 18914"] Parks - Not sure what you are saying is "Wrong!". Please read my post carefully - MoBoost was correct that in that sentence snip that is being replayed repeatedly the President was referring to the roads, etc. not to their businesses per se. BUT (and here's the key point I was trying to make) his overall intent was to justify an ever increasing tax burden as "owed by right" with no logical limits or historical precedent necessary In fact, he constantly wishes to avoid a discussion of what are the [proper limits of government and the President makes quite clear that in the economic realm he believes whatever the citizenry is "allowed" to keep is largesse from government not really their own hard-earned income/wealth. I doubt very much that the President's campaign wants us to take away what I posted as his campaign message. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Nobel Peace Prize
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom