Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Nordyke V. King 9th Circuit En Banc.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1208352" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>The case just got sent back to the original 3 judge panel to be heard "<a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/07/12/07-15763.pdf" target="_blank">in light of McDonald v. City of Chicago</a>"...</p><p></p><p>My bet is that they will lose (again) because the Supreme Court did not give an opinion on the "sensitive places" exception from Second Amendment protection announced in Heller.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1208352, member: 5151"] The case just got sent back to the original 3 judge panel to be heard "[URL="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/07/12/07-15763.pdf"]in light of McDonald v. City of Chicago[/URL]"... My bet is that they will lose (again) because the Supreme Court did not give an opinion on the "sensitive places" exception from Second Amendment protection announced in Heller. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Nordyke V. King 9th Circuit En Banc.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
