Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Nordyke V. King 9th Circuit En Banc.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 1208531" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>This will be a good starting place to answer that very question on "sensitive places" and other "reasonable restrictions". While it's true the Court gave no definitive answer, it did not endorse nor affirm that any of the current restrictions on bearing arms in "sensitive places", etc., are constitutional. The Court in <em>Heller</em> made a point of saying those restrictions were "presumptively" constitutional:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 1208531, member: 745"] This will be a good starting place to answer that very question on "sensitive places" and other "reasonable restrictions". While it's true the Court gave no definitive answer, it did not endorse nor affirm that any of the current restrictions on bearing arms in "sensitive places", etc., are constitutional. The Court in [i]Heller[/i] made a point of saying those restrictions were "presumptively" constitutional: Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Nordyke V. King 9th Circuit En Banc.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
