Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Not Hillary, Not Trump--How about anti-gun Libertarian VP candidate William F. Weld?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2904005" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>They are definitely heavily weighted to the RINO side, I'll give you that. The oil money dried up and they suddenly can't find a tax or fee hike they don't like.</p><p></p><p>But the Johnson/Weld ticket isn't libertarian in the least. Johnson ran as a repub last time around. He lost then, knew he'd lose to them again, and definitely would lose to Hildebeast, so he only has Libertarian left. He's just running where he can run without any competition because that's the only place he can win. I honestly think he'd have done better against Hillary that those that actually did run against her. At least he'd have his principles in common with her and would give the dims a whole lot more <em>TRUSTABLE</em> candidate. Johnson is guilty of talking out both sides of his mouth and saying anything his audience wants to hear, but he's not corrupt like that *****. As it is he's pulling his votes from her, I think had he ran against her he'd have done better than most think and with each passing day I'd give him a better chance if he'd ran against her and <em>THEN </em>went 3rd party.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2904005, member: 3099"] They are definitely heavily weighted to the RINO side, I'll give you that. The oil money dried up and they suddenly can't find a tax or fee hike they don't like. But the Johnson/Weld ticket isn't libertarian in the least. Johnson ran as a repub last time around. He lost then, knew he'd lose to them again, and definitely would lose to Hildebeast, so he only has Libertarian left. He's just running where he can run without any competition because that's the only place he can win. I honestly think he'd have done better against Hillary that those that actually did run against her. At least he'd have his principles in common with her and would give the dims a whole lot more [I]TRUSTABLE[/I] candidate. Johnson is guilty of talking out both sides of his mouth and saying anything his audience wants to hear, but he's not corrupt like that *****. As it is he's pulling his votes from her, I think had he ran against her he'd have done better than most think and with each passing day I'd give him a better chance if he'd ran against her and [I]THEN [/I]went 3rd party. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Not Hillary, Not Trump--How about anti-gun Libertarian VP candidate William F. Weld?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom