Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA and H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="keeper7011" data-source="post: 1175414" data-attributes="member: 7365"><p>It seems as if the NRA is more concerned about themselves once again.</p><p>From their own website:</p><p></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">"The National Rifle Association believes that any restrictions on the political speech of Americans are unconstitutional.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">In the past, through the courts and in Congress, the NRA has opposed any effort to restrict the rights of its four million members to speak and have their voices heard on behalf of gun owners nationwide.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">The NRAs opposition to restrictions on political speech includes its May 26, 2010 letter to Members of Congress expressing strong concerns about H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act. As it stood at the time of that letter, the measure would have undermined or obliterated virtually all of the NRAs right to free political speech and, therefore, jeopardized the Second Amendment rights of every law-abiding American.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">The most potent defense of the Second Amendment requires the most adamant exercise of the First Amendment. The NRA stands absolutely obligated to its members to ensure maximum access to the First Amendment, in order to protect and preserve the freedom of the Second Amendment.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">The NRA must preserve its ability to speak. It cannot risk a strategy that would deny its rights, for the Second Amendment cannot be defended without them.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">Thus, the NRAs first obligation must be to its members and to its most ardent defense of firearms freedom for Americas lawful gun owners.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">On June 14, 2010, Democratic leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives pledged that H.R. 5175 would be amended to exempt groups like the NRA, that meet certain criteria, from its onerous restrictions on political speech. As a result, and as long as that remains the case, the NRA will not be involved in final consideration of the House bill.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">The NRA cannot defend the Second Amendment from the attacks we face in the local, state, federal, international and judicial arenas without the ability to speak. We will not allow ourselves to be silenced while the national news media, politicians and others are allowed to attack us freely.</span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue">The NRA will continue to fight for its right to speak out in defense of the Second Amendment. Any efforts to silence the political speech of NRA members will, as has been the case in the past, be met with strong opposition."</span></p><p></p><p>Seems to me, IMO, there is a lot of contradictions there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="keeper7011, post: 1175414, member: 7365"] It seems as if the NRA is more concerned about themselves once again. From their own website: [COLOR="RoyalBlue"]"The National Rifle Association believes that any restrictions on the political speech of Americans are unconstitutional. In the past, through the courts and in Congress, the NRA has opposed any effort to restrict the rights of its four million members to speak and have their voices heard on behalf of gun owners nationwide. The NRAs opposition to restrictions on political speech includes its May 26, 2010 letter to Members of Congress expressing strong concerns about H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act. As it stood at the time of that letter, the measure would have undermined or obliterated virtually all of the NRAs right to free political speech and, therefore, jeopardized the Second Amendment rights of every law-abiding American. The most potent defense of the Second Amendment requires the most adamant exercise of the First Amendment. The NRA stands absolutely obligated to its members to ensure maximum access to the First Amendment, in order to protect and preserve the freedom of the Second Amendment. The NRA must preserve its ability to speak. It cannot risk a strategy that would deny its rights, for the Second Amendment cannot be defended without them. Thus, the NRAs first obligation must be to its members and to its most ardent defense of firearms freedom for Americas lawful gun owners. On June 14, 2010, Democratic leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives pledged that H.R. 5175 would be amended to exempt groups like the NRA, that meet certain criteria, from its onerous restrictions on political speech. As a result, and as long as that remains the case, the NRA will not be involved in final consideration of the House bill. The NRA cannot defend the Second Amendment from the attacks we face in the local, state, federal, international and judicial arenas without the ability to speak. We will not allow ourselves to be silenced while the national news media, politicians and others are allowed to attack us freely. The NRA will continue to fight for its right to speak out in defense of the Second Amendment. Any efforts to silence the political speech of NRA members will, as has been the case in the past, be met with strong opposition."[/COLOR] Seems to me, IMO, there is a lot of contradictions there. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA and H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom