Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DirtyDawg" data-source="post: 1859300" data-attributes="member: 9113">The Negotiated Rights Association is nothing more than a political union that perpetuates its existence through constant demand of donations, meanwhile it compromises on the Constitution.&nbsp;&nbsp; Unless the leadership/board can be changed, it will continue undermining our rights and the 2nd Amendment.&nbsp; Either everyone has forgotten, or, they choose to ignore the fact that the NRA supported the re-election of Harry Reid in 2010.&nbsp; Rather than getting behind the Tea Party conservative candidate, Sharon Angle, the NRA donated to the re-election of Harry Reid.&nbsp; Sure, the NRA says &quot;we don&#039;t endorse Reid&quot;, but, they donated to his campaign and refused to come out in support of his opponent.&nbsp; I have to ask the NRA members, &quot;Is Harry Reid a proponent of limited government (more freedom), less spending, national sovereignty (no open borders), and unobstructed firearm ownership?&quot;&nbsp; Remember, Reid confirmed two extremely liberal Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41538.html#ixzz22CMgsEaE" target="_blank">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41538.html#ixzz22CMgsEaE</a>If the NRA didn&#039;t like Reid&#039;s opponent Sharon Angle, why didn&#039;t they get behind another conservative opponent instead of pandering??I&#039;m still interested in hearing comments on my page 2 of this thread citing the history of the NRA.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DirtyDawg, post: 1859300, member: 9113"] The Negotiated Rights Association is nothing more than a political union that perpetuates its existence through constant demand of donations, meanwhile it compromises on the Constitution. Unless the leadership/board can be changed, it will continue undermining our rights and the 2nd Amendment. Either everyone has forgotten, or, they choose to ignore the fact that the NRA supported the re-election of Harry Reid in 2010. Rather than getting behind the Tea Party conservative candidate, Sharon Angle, the NRA donated to the re-election of Harry Reid. Sure, the NRA says "we don't endorse Reid", but, they donated to his campaign and refused to come out in support of his opponent. I have to ask the NRA members, "Is Harry Reid a proponent of limited government (more freedom), less spending, national sovereignty (no open borders), and unobstructed firearm ownership?" Remember, Reid confirmed two extremely liberal Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. [url]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41538.html#ixzz22CMgsEaE[/url] If the NRA didn't like Reid's opponent Sharon Angle, why didn't they get behind another conservative opponent instead of pandering?? I'm still interested in hearing comments on my page 2 of this thread citing the history of the NRA. [/QUOTE]

Verification