Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
O. S. U.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 2289783" data-attributes="member: 26737"><p>I don't know about Evans, but <em>someone</em> at <em>SI</em> should've been doing some fact checking. Hell's bells, that's why reputable journalistic enterprises have, you know, <em>fact checkers</em>. At the very least, the editors should've been hounding them for confirmation; it is inconceivable that such a major piece could go to print containing as much apparent factual discrepancy as this one does.</p><p></p><p>I haven't bothered to check out the <em>SI</em> article, but I did hear on the radio the other day that the "Bell" mentioned in the Monday article was not, in fact, Tatum Bell (I forget the other player's first name), although the way the article was written, it led one to the conclusion that it was. I wonder if that's the case in Carter's statement?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 2289783, member: 26737"] I don't know about Evans, but [I]someone[/I] at [I]SI[/I] should've been doing some fact checking. Hell's bells, that's why reputable journalistic enterprises have, you know, [I]fact checkers[/I]. At the very least, the editors should've been hounding them for confirmation; it is inconceivable that such a major piece could go to print containing as much apparent factual discrepancy as this one does. I haven't bothered to check out the [I]SI[/I] article, but I did hear on the radio the other day that the "Bell" mentioned in the Monday article was not, in fact, Tatum Bell (I forget the other player's first name), although the way the article was written, it led one to the conclusion that it was. I wonder if that's the case in Carter's statement? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
O. S. U.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom