Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Observation - People on edge...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OKRuss" data-source="post: 3815532" data-attributes="member: 41777"><p>Because JOC said so that's why!</p><p></p><p>What's typical of a conspiracy theorist is they add all this hype and drama with words like "en masse" then unable to back their claims. Yeah, a few doctors/nurses/hospitals have had shooters but 'en masse' is quite an overreach.</p><p></p><p>Estimated 5,475,000 nurses(RN, LPN, NP). Estimated 1,018,776 physicians. Total 6.493,776. To me and likely most, "en masse" would probably equate to at least 10%. Right? 649,377 would have to be killed. Maybe 1% aligns better to his definition of "en masse". 64,937.</p><p></p><p>He can link you to a few articles about hospital shootings but it ain't anywhere even CLOSE to 1% but let's get everyone to play my conspiracy game and then I'll change the definition of 'en masse' to fit the narrative. This dude is a real piece of work.</p><p></p><p>I'd LOVE to see the sources for the Afghanistan war being 100% for the big pharma companies to make millions/billions on the opioid market. Laughable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OKRuss, post: 3815532, member: 41777"] Because JOC said so that's why! What's typical of a conspiracy theorist is they add all this hype and drama with words like "en masse" then unable to back their claims. Yeah, a few doctors/nurses/hospitals have had shooters but 'en masse' is quite an overreach. Estimated 5,475,000 nurses(RN, LPN, NP). Estimated 1,018,776 physicians. Total 6.493,776. To me and likely most, "en masse" would probably equate to at least 10%. Right? 649,377 would have to be killed. Maybe 1% aligns better to his definition of "en masse". 64,937. He can link you to a few articles about hospital shootings but it ain't anywhere even CLOSE to 1% but let's get everyone to play my conspiracy game and then I'll change the definition of 'en masse' to fit the narrative. This dude is a real piece of work. I'd LOVE to see the sources for the Afghanistan war being 100% for the big pharma companies to make millions/billions on the opioid market. Laughable. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Observation - People on edge...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom