Responding to above questions:
Who to trust in the medical mainstream? I don't think the medical mainstream is as fragmented as our favorite sources of information may indicate. One you can likely trust is your physician. I'd bet that they read authoritative sources of research regularly. Don't go to them and ask about your pre-formed ideas from your information sources, however. You are paying them for their expertise. Let them share what they know without setting up an argument or they will likely acquiesce rather than argue fruitlessly and waste time.
One study or expose is exactly what a journ-o-list wants to write a gripping piece. They are not after the truth, just your attention. The news is always confused...you doctor reads broadly and is not. You might also consider online sources like Mayo Clinic and other respected medical names.
Why are countries and cities with the most stringent lockdowns and mask requirements experiencing the worst spikes? If they are, there may be confounding factors...perhaps the stringent measures are in response to past spikes that are owning to high levels of closeness between people (e.g. subway, elevators, bars....). Perhaps the data is being cherry-picked by journ-o-lists to make a gripping read.
Part of the problem is us. We want to figure it out and fix it. But we are blind to our own shortcomings in terms of lack of understanding of the scientific and health care subject matter areas needed to be able to take all available studies in, process them and form a good opinion. There are disagreements within science and one study does not change everything. A study needs to be assessed in terms of experimental design (does it adequately control for confounding factors?), statistical validity and how it fits with other studies in the general area. Please do not try to obtain an understanding of science by googling - with rare exceptions the path to becoming equipped to understand science well is to go to graduate school and design and conduct experiments yourself and learn all preexisting research findings in an area (Epidemiology, Virology in this case). None of us in OSA have this skill set. Our doctors do not have this skill set but they read researchers who do.
Who to trust in the medical mainstream? I don't think the medical mainstream is as fragmented as our favorite sources of information may indicate. One you can likely trust is your physician. I'd bet that they read authoritative sources of research regularly. Don't go to them and ask about your pre-formed ideas from your information sources, however. You are paying them for their expertise. Let them share what they know without setting up an argument or they will likely acquiesce rather than argue fruitlessly and waste time.
One study or expose is exactly what a journ-o-list wants to write a gripping piece. They are not after the truth, just your attention. The news is always confused...you doctor reads broadly and is not. You might also consider online sources like Mayo Clinic and other respected medical names.
Why are countries and cities with the most stringent lockdowns and mask requirements experiencing the worst spikes? If they are, there may be confounding factors...perhaps the stringent measures are in response to past spikes that are owning to high levels of closeness between people (e.g. subway, elevators, bars....). Perhaps the data is being cherry-picked by journ-o-lists to make a gripping read.
Part of the problem is us. We want to figure it out and fix it. But we are blind to our own shortcomings in terms of lack of understanding of the scientific and health care subject matter areas needed to be able to take all available studies in, process them and form a good opinion. There are disagreements within science and one study does not change everything. A study needs to be assessed in terms of experimental design (does it adequately control for confounding factors?), statistical validity and how it fits with other studies in the general area. Please do not try to obtain an understanding of science by googling - with rare exceptions the path to becoming equipped to understand science well is to go to graduate school and design and conduct experiments yourself and learn all preexisting research findings in an area (Epidemiology, Virology in this case). None of us in OSA have this skill set. Our doctors do not have this skill set but they read researchers who do.
Last edited: