Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OKC Man Acquitted Of Manslaughter After His Dogs Fatally Attacked An 82-Year-Old Woman
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3668962" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>This verdict is odd considering Oklahoma's laws on dogs. All dogs, friendly or aggressive, are to be kept in a secure enclosure when outside, and your fenced yard is not considered secure due to most of Oklahoma being a rear easement system. A kennel or special built dog run is what is needed. The reason for this is so utilities can have dogs removed from yards when easement access is needed unless they are in a secure enclosure away from the easement area. I've had this conversation with many a home owner while trying to get access to our pedestals in my job (even had to call the cops 3 times to enforce easement access, got access all three times). So for them to rule not guilty surely smacks of a pc ruling rather than a lawful ruling. I hope he gets eviscerated in civil court.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3668962, member: 43724"] This verdict is odd considering Oklahoma's laws on dogs. All dogs, friendly or aggressive, are to be kept in a secure enclosure when outside, and your fenced yard is not considered secure due to most of Oklahoma being a rear easement system. A kennel or special built dog run is what is needed. The reason for this is so utilities can have dogs removed from yards when easement access is needed unless they are in a secure enclosure away from the easement area. I've had this conversation with many a home owner while trying to get access to our pedestals in my job (even had to call the cops 3 times to enforce easement access, got access all three times). So for them to rule not guilty surely smacks of a pc ruling rather than a lawful ruling. I hope he gets eviscerated in civil court. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OKC Man Acquitted Of Manslaughter After His Dogs Fatally Attacked An 82-Year-Old Woman
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom