Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3984925" data-attributes="member: 1132">There are both groups and individual politicians who are trying to get pedophiles, whom they call &quot;Minor Attracted Persons&quot;, or &quot;MAPS&quot; protected under discrimination laws, based on their minority sexual orientation status. So far as I know, they&#039;ve had no success to date in state or federal jurisdictions. IMO, even the term &quot;MAP&quot; should be harshly rebuked in every forum, every time it&#039;s used. They&#039;re pedophiles and they need to be labeled as such. Anyone using the term &quot;MAP&quot; to soften their crimes is a pedophile enabler to me. I say this because if &quot;MAP&quot; ever becomes accepted in any official way, then children lose and pedophiles win. I&#039;m not down with that. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3984925, member: 1132"] There are both groups and individual politicians who are trying to get pedophiles, whom they call "Minor Attracted Persons", or "MAPS" protected under discrimination laws, based on their minority sexual orientation status. So far as I know, they've had no success to date in state or federal jurisdictions. IMO, even the term "MAP" should be harshly rebuked in every forum, every time it's used. They're pedophiles and they need to be labeled as such. Anyone using the term "MAP" to soften their crimes is a pedophile enabler to me. I say this because if "MAP" ever becomes accepted in any official way, then children lose and pedophiles win. I'm not down with that. :( [/QUOTE]

Verification