Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma Earthquake Politics
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="okietool" data-source="post: 2720779" data-attributes="member: 6030"><p>Preliminary Findings</p><p></p><p>A team of USGS scientists led by Bill Ellsworth analyzed changes in the rate of earthquake occurrence using large USGS databases of earthquakes recorded since 1970. The increase in seismicity has been found to coincide with the injection of wastewater in deep disposal wells in several locations, including Colorado, Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Ohio. Much of this wastewater is a byproduct of oil and gas production and is routinely disposed of by injection into wells specifically designed and approved for this purpose.</p><p></p><p>Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as “fracking,” does not appear to be linked to the increased rate of magnitude 3 and larger earthquakes.</p><p></p><p>Although wastewater injection has not yet been linked to large earthquakes (M6+), scientists cannot eliminate the possibility. It does appear that wastewater disposal induced the M5.3 Raton Basin, Colorado earthquake in 2011 as well as the M5.6 quake that struck Prague, Oklahoma in 2011, leading to a few injuries and damage to more than a dozen homes.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Doesn't that basically say we don't know? (yet) In one sentence it says "wastewater injection has not yet been linked to large earthquakes (M6+), scientists cannot eliminate the possibility", in the next it says "It does appear that wastewater disposal induced ". To me that says we think maybe. On the "fracking" it says no link. Probably the same on the fracing too. I still think it's a combination of things oil & gas production, increased demand on the aquifers and waste water disposal. Now who do we hold responsible for following the guidelines and it going bad? I say everyone, every man, woman or child who has ever ridden in a car, enjoyed electricity generated by natural gas, every mineral owner, every stock holder. Including me. Tax.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="okietool, post: 2720779, member: 6030"] Preliminary Findings A team of USGS scientists led by Bill Ellsworth analyzed changes in the rate of earthquake occurrence using large USGS databases of earthquakes recorded since 1970. The increase in seismicity has been found to coincide with the injection of wastewater in deep disposal wells in several locations, including Colorado, Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Ohio. Much of this wastewater is a byproduct of oil and gas production and is routinely disposed of by injection into wells specifically designed and approved for this purpose. Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as “fracking,” does not appear to be linked to the increased rate of magnitude 3 and larger earthquakes. Although wastewater injection has not yet been linked to large earthquakes (M6+), scientists cannot eliminate the possibility. It does appear that wastewater disposal induced the M5.3 Raton Basin, Colorado earthquake in 2011 as well as the M5.6 quake that struck Prague, Oklahoma in 2011, leading to a few injuries and damage to more than a dozen homes. Doesn't that basically say we don't know? (yet) In one sentence it says "wastewater injection has not yet been linked to large earthquakes (M6+), scientists cannot eliminate the possibility", in the next it says "It does appear that wastewater disposal induced ". To me that says we think maybe. On the "fracking" it says no link. Probably the same on the fracing too. I still think it's a combination of things oil & gas production, increased demand on the aquifers and waste water disposal. Now who do we hold responsible for following the guidelines and it going bad? I say everyone, every man, woman or child who has ever ridden in a car, enjoyed electricity generated by natural gas, every mineral owner, every stock holder. Including me. Tax. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma Earthquake Politics
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom