Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma Earthquake Politics
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="okietool" data-source="post: 2720824" data-attributes="member: 6030"><p>Exactly. If the production companies get tagged for liability do you think they'll just eat the cost? It gets passed on to the consumer one way or another. It's not beyond belief they would have an assessment against stock holders. In that case it will have an effect on a lot of mutual funds that trade on the Fortune 500 or 1000. Even a production tax would impact old production unfairly, but it would be more equitable than just lawsuits. IMO. In other cases it will get passed on to the liability insurance underwriters. That's still going to come back on everyone in the end. As much as I dislike taxes, a tax would be the easy way to do it.</p><p></p><p>Is there really anyone that hasn't benefitted by the increase in oil and gas production? Especially now when oil prices are down because supply is up, because of modern horizontal drilling and fracing.</p><p></p><p>I'm gonna guess Ohio has far fewer wells and a lot different geology as well as a different attitude.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="okietool, post: 2720824, member: 6030"] Exactly. If the production companies get tagged for liability do you think they'll just eat the cost? It gets passed on to the consumer one way or another. It's not beyond belief they would have an assessment against stock holders. In that case it will have an effect on a lot of mutual funds that trade on the Fortune 500 or 1000. Even a production tax would impact old production unfairly, but it would be more equitable than just lawsuits. IMO. In other cases it will get passed on to the liability insurance underwriters. That's still going to come back on everyone in the end. As much as I dislike taxes, a tax would be the easy way to do it. Is there really anyone that hasn't benefitted by the increase in oil and gas production? Especially now when oil prices are down because supply is up, because of modern horizontal drilling and fracing. I'm gonna guess Ohio has far fewer wells and a lot different geology as well as a different attitude. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma Earthquake Politics
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom