Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Matt Giroux" data-source="post: 3691029" data-attributes="member: 45570"><p>My understanding of this specific issue (not much), is that the tribes got reduced license costs as a reparation of sorts since it was argued that they shouldn't have to pay to hunt land that was historically theirs (pre statehood). Tribal (card carrying) members are still allowed to hunt and take game without a license on tribal land but that is it. So for those members who do not live near their registered tribal lands the cheaper licenses were a way of allowing them to hunt state and/or private land at a reduced cost.</p></blockquote><p></p>