Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Oklahoma Gov. Stitt won't renew hunting, fishing compacts with Cherokee, Choctaw tribes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 3691682" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>I can't get past the 200,000 licenses when they are only selling 3k or so. Why would the tribes do that? I mean maybe if all tribes could purchase them I could see how maybe that would come at least into the same universe. Maybe.</p><p></p><p>My Ex's tribe has to provide services for all Oklahoma tribes due to federal grants, so if it's something along those lines maybe the number of licenses makes some sense. Especially if it's like you said earlier and it's actually an "up to" total.</p><p></p><p>If I'm missing something so be it, but this just doesn't seem anywhere near a possible reality and it makes it really hard to decide which side is right.</p><p></p><p>ETA: A bit more light here:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 3691682, member: 3099"] I can't get past the 200,000 licenses when they are only selling 3k or so. Why would the tribes do that? I mean maybe if all tribes could purchase them I could see how maybe that would come at least into the same universe. Maybe. My Ex's tribe has to provide services for all Oklahoma tribes due to federal grants, so if it's something along those lines maybe the number of licenses makes some sense. Especially if it's like you said earlier and it's actually an "up to" total. If I'm missing something so be it, but this just doesn't seem anywhere near a possible reality and it makes it really hard to decide which side is right. ETA: A bit more light here: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Oklahoma Gov. Stitt won't renew hunting, fishing compacts with Cherokee, Choctaw tribes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
