Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3796392" data-attributes="member: 43724">First off, absolutely no one said "at least the rights of shooter were not infringed". And I hate to say it this way, because its quite crass, but yes, people have died. **** happens. Doesn't mean I'm responsible and should pay the price. I like to drive. I also like the occasional wobble pop. Does that mean I drink and drive? No. Does that mean I should have an interlock in my car? No. How about my car restricted to only 50 MPH? How about if someone sees me shake my fist at someone that cut me off I lose my license? These are all anagrams for what they want to do to the second amendment. The funny part is that no one suggests those for every day drivers yet auto related deaths outpace criminal homicide by firearm every single year. As for your second point, how would a store clerk accurately know how a person is feeling? Yes, if the person comes in and said they were purchasing a firearm to go kill someone, well duh. But if someone is that upset but hides it, smiles, makes small talk etc how is that sales clerk supposed to know? That line of thinking right there was the very reason we have the PLCA. People were suing gun retailers because they somehow should have known the state of mind of the person they sold the gun to. So that line of thinking needs to be nixed.</blockquote>