Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma House democrats introduce SAVE Act to curb gun violence
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3796687" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>I've glossed over the new bipartisan (rino) framework (political legal speak meant to mislead the reader) that the committee came up with. </p><p>Some of which says to improve school security and spend more on mental health issues. </p><p>The AR ban biden wanted was not in it. </p><p>If it doesn't get watered down with riders and the final writing of the bill is the same as the framework, I could agree with a small part of it. </p><p>It's the same things those of us that are shall not be infringed minded have discussed in this thread. Don't blame the firearm but get back to mental health issues and school security.</p><p>Being politics, I'm sure the Framework that they have presented will eventually be against everything we believe in, but I'll quote their exact words.</p><p></p><p>Our plan increases needed mental health resources, improves school security and support for students, and helps ensure dangerous criminals and those who are adjudicated as mentally ill can't purchases weapons. Most importantly our plan saves lives while also protecting the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans. We look forward to earning broad, bipartisan support and passing our commonsense proposal into law the Senators said in a group statement"</p><p></p><p>For me, the words commonsense present a big red flag. That's the buzz word the politicians use when it should say gun control. The language in the "framework" only enhances what most of us agree on that your already prevented from purchasing a firearm if your judged to be mentally defective. What's new about that?</p><p>It doesn't address national red flag laws that some wanted. It does address enhanced security background checks on gun purchasers between the ages of 18-21 perhaps like @ GTG proposed but doesn't prevent them from purchases and there is no waiting period proposed longer than what we have currently if I read it right. </p><p>Again, when it comes down to a final bill, it could be 180 degrees in the opposite direction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3796687, member: 5412"] I've glossed over the new bipartisan (rino) framework (political legal speak meant to mislead the reader) that the committee came up with. Some of which says to improve school security and spend more on mental health issues. The AR ban biden wanted was not in it. If it doesn't get watered down with riders and the final writing of the bill is the same as the framework, I could agree with a small part of it. It's the same things those of us that are shall not be infringed minded have discussed in this thread. Don't blame the firearm but get back to mental health issues and school security. Being politics, I'm sure the Framework that they have presented will eventually be against everything we believe in, but I'll quote their exact words. Our plan increases needed mental health resources, improves school security and support for students, and helps ensure dangerous criminals and those who are adjudicated as mentally ill can't purchases weapons. Most importantly our plan saves lives while also protecting the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans. We look forward to earning broad, bipartisan support and passing our commonsense proposal into law the Senators said in a group statement" For me, the words commonsense present a big red flag. That's the buzz word the politicians use when it should say gun control. The language in the "framework" only enhances what most of us agree on that your already prevented from purchasing a firearm if your judged to be mentally defective. What's new about that? It doesn't address national red flag laws that some wanted. It does address enhanced security background checks on gun purchasers between the ages of 18-21 perhaps like @ GTG proposed but doesn't prevent them from purchases and there is no waiting period proposed longer than what we have currently if I read it right. Again, when it comes down to a final bill, it could be 180 degrees in the opposite direction. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma House democrats introduce SAVE Act to curb gun violence
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
