Waiting for the Sheriff to explain how the audio was modified. He's already lost a big chunk of public trust in his county so it's not like he can do his job in an objectively perceived manner from here on out.
I’m going to assume these three individuals aren’t complete wind lickers, and the statements were taken out of context. In my opinion, they should’ve known better than to say something so controversial even if they thought it or were joking.
I understand that what they said was not PC... But what about a damn reporter that left his mic hot in an attempt to spy on others. And at what point can someone talk about things that aren't PC, but not something that is something they haven't acted on. Or even said they will act on.
I'll stand by those guys rights to be morons and talk about things they shouldn't even be thinking about. and the voters should be left to make the changes IF they seem fit. And that damn reporter being banned from public building for recording others without permission.
I'll stand by those guys rights to be morons and talk about things they shouldn't even be thinking about. and the voters should be left to make the changes IF they seem fit. And that damn reporter being banned from public building for recording others without permission.
What?!? Defending the right for people to say things, even if you don't agree with them?
A trope many like to throw out, but NEVER actually mean. Much like the "freedom" garbage that everyone supports, until it's a "freedom" they don't agree with. Kudos to you.
Similar threads
