Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma State Questions
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1331783" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>Not everything is 100% binary black and white. I personally consider term limits to be a reasonable safeguard against politicians building to strong of an relationship with interests contrary to those of their constituents, just as the Electoral College is a reasonable safeguard against allowing a slim majority to prosper in the Presidential election because of herd mentality.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So you think it is reasonable to sacrifice Oklahoma business interests that create the tax base by providing jobs for Oklahomans because a measure purports to "protect" against Sharia Law?</p><p></p><p>Cultural defenses other than Sharia Law are more of a problem in the United States than Sharia Law.</p><p></p><p>That paragraph that you posted didn't explain anything other than "Islam == bad". What about other religious groups, including Christian extremists?</p><p></p><p>I'm still waiting on intelligent answers rather than xenophobic rhetoric.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1331783, member: 5151"] Not everything is 100% binary black and white. I personally consider term limits to be a reasonable safeguard against politicians building to strong of an relationship with interests contrary to those of their constituents, just as the Electoral College is a reasonable safeguard against allowing a slim majority to prosper in the Presidential election because of herd mentality. So you think it is reasonable to sacrifice Oklahoma business interests that create the tax base by providing jobs for Oklahomans because a measure purports to "protect" against Sharia Law? Cultural defenses other than Sharia Law are more of a problem in the United States than Sharia Law. That paragraph that you posted didn't explain anything other than "Islam == bad". What about other religious groups, including Christian extremists? I'm still waiting on intelligent answers rather than xenophobic rhetoric. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma State Questions
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom