Normal
I’m not totally against this idea on one proviso…they only can be held liable for commercial activity! (Guiding/leasing)Already too many deterrents to free access. Don’t need another one!Also have to realize this wouldn’t stop guiding from happening but would make it more expensive for the hunters as more regulations only ever cost the end user more. BUT if landowners were held liable too they be way more watchful about what was happening.
I’m not totally against this idea on one proviso…they only can be held liable for commercial activity! (Guiding/leasing)
Already too many deterrents to free access. Don’t need another one!
Also have to realize this wouldn’t stop guiding from happening but would make it more expensive for the hunters as more regulations only ever cost the end user more. BUT if landowners were held liable too they be way more watchful about what was happening.
