Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rc508pir" data-source="post: 2886247" data-attributes="member: 40091">No, hes basically talking a flat rate mark up instead of the usual 10%.&nbsp;&nbsp; You would pay HIS cost for the gun at no profit and pay what he would charge for a transfer fee. Plus shipping, plus tax as well.&nbsp; If you buy a $400 gun from him and he charges $40 for a transfer fee, that&#039;s $440.&nbsp; That would be the same as the $400 gun and a&nbsp; 10% markup.&nbsp; Works out for the buyer the higher the price of the gun, but the lower the price of the gun the less beneficial it is to the buyer.&nbsp; Of course&nbsp; that depends on where he sets his Transfer fee.Since I build my own ARs,&nbsp; Buying say, a Spikes Lower for $100 would be no real benefit since 10% of $100 would be $110 as opposed to the transfer fee would be $140.&nbsp; But If I bought a $2000 BCM&nbsp; it would be a deal since the 10% markup would be $2200 but with his transfer fee it would be $2040</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rc508pir, post: 2886247, member: 40091"] No, hes basically talking a flat rate mark up instead of the usual 10%. You would pay HIS cost for the gun at no profit and pay what he would charge for a transfer fee. Plus shipping, plus tax as well. If you buy a $400 gun from him and he charges $40 for a transfer fee, that's $440. That would be the same as the $400 gun and a 10% markup. Works out for the buyer the higher the price of the gun, but the lower the price of the gun the less beneficial it is to the buyer. Of course that depends on where he sets his Transfer fee. Since I build my own ARs, Buying say, a Spikes Lower for $100 would be no real benefit since 10% of $100 would be $110 as opposed to the transfer fee would be $140. But If I bought a $2000 BCM it would be a deal since the 10% markup would be $2200 but with his transfer fee it would be $2040 [/QUOTE]

Verification