Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Only YOU Can Protect Net Neutrality
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightningCrash" data-source="post: 2715840" data-attributes="member: 4278"><p>It's only backed up by the text of Pai's opinion, which already coincides with your beliefs on the topic.</p><p></p><p>* FCC micromanagement of the Internet</p><p> <span style="color: red">> Only in Pai's commentary</span></p><p>* Rate regulation</p><p><span style="color: red"> > Only in Pai's opinion. In other opinions commissioners say this is not going to happen</span></p><p>* FCC approval of consumer plans</p><p> <span style="color: red">> Only in Pai's commentary. Disputed by other commentary. </span></p><p>* Estimated $11B increase in broadband bills due to increased taxes.</p><p><span style="color: red">> None of the commissioners claimed there would be $11B in new taxes. </span></p><p>* Likelihood of slower connections (Europe is 23% slower on average and has similar regulation in place)</p><p> <span style="color: red">>Pai claims it will be slower, but doesn't even say 23%. Where did you come up with 23%?</span></p><p>* Reduction of competition due to higher barrier to entry</p><p><span style="color: red">> grepped for barrier, reduction, zero results. Where did you find this?</span></p><p>* Despite 93% of broadband users subscribing to 17 carriers, compliance costs will likely drive many of the 3,000 rural broadband providers out of business</p><p><span style="color: red">> No mention of compliance or comply in any of the texts.</span></p><p>* Definition of "broadband" for rural carriers changed from 4/1 to 25/3.</p><p><span style="color: red"> >Only mention of rural is to say there are over 700 rural carriers. Where did you find this?</span></p><p>* USF changed from 10/1 to 25/3.</p><p><span style="color: red"> > The only mention of universal in the opinions doesn't change its definition. There are no results for USF. Where did you find this?</span></p><p>* No bright-line rules - all interpretations on a case-by-case basis.</p><p><span style="color: red"> >The head of the commission says they're bright-line rules</span></p><p>* Advisory opinions are non-binding (meaning a provider can ask for and receive approval from the FCC on an action, and the FCC can then rule against that action at a future date).</p><p><span style="color: red"> >Advisory opinions are only available in certain circumstances, which we don't have text on. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightningCrash, post: 2715840, member: 4278"] It's only backed up by the text of Pai's opinion, which already coincides with your beliefs on the topic. * FCC micromanagement of the Internet [color=red]> Only in Pai's commentary[/color] * Rate regulation [color=red] > Only in Pai's opinion. In other opinions commissioners say this is not going to happen[/color] * FCC approval of consumer plans [color=red]> Only in Pai's commentary. Disputed by other commentary. [/color] * Estimated $11B increase in broadband bills due to increased taxes. [color=red]> None of the commissioners claimed there would be $11B in new taxes. [/color] * Likelihood of slower connections (Europe is 23% slower on average and has similar regulation in place) [color=red]>Pai claims it will be slower, but doesn't even say 23%. Where did you come up with 23%?[/color] * Reduction of competition due to higher barrier to entry [color=red]> grepped for barrier, reduction, zero results. Where did you find this?[/color] * Despite 93% of broadband users subscribing to 17 carriers, compliance costs will likely drive many of the 3,000 rural broadband providers out of business [color=red]> No mention of compliance or comply in any of the texts.[/color] * Definition of "broadband" for rural carriers changed from 4/1 to 25/3. [color=red] >Only mention of rural is to say there are over 700 rural carriers. Where did you find this?[/color] * USF changed from 10/1 to 25/3. [color=red] > The only mention of universal in the opinions doesn't change its definition. There are no results for USF. Where did you find this?[/color] * No bright-line rules - all interpretations on a case-by-case basis. [color=red] >The head of the commission says they're bright-line rules[/color] * Advisory opinions are non-binding (meaning a provider can ask for and receive approval from the FCC on an action, and the FCC can then rule against that action at a future date). [color=red] >Advisory opinions are only available in certain circumstances, which we don't have text on. [/color] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Only YOU Can Protect Net Neutrality
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom