Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Open Carry poll
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Badley" data-source="post: 1034338" data-attributes="member: 10852"><p>I have a question for yall, why do you feel the need to carry? Is it for personal protection, intimidation, or assault? When Im speaking of carry, I am talking about on your person. </p><p></p><p>My opinion on this matter is that you should be able to carry, concealed or open. I myself carry for personal protection. If I am in a situation that causes me to have to use my weapon, I plan on using my weapon to neutralize the situation and/or removing my self from it. I dont feel I need a long gun or shot gun to do this. I dont plan on going on the offensive. </p><p></p><p>My opinion on what a person can carry varies. Shot guns, Rifles, "assault weapons" (Pretty much any thing thats fully automatic) really dont have a place in "on person" carry. Should you be able to have access to these weapons? Sure, although from personal experience, fully automatic weapons are better for creating noise and distraction, than they are for identifying a target and removing that target. And my experience is not shooting at a individuals of course, just shooting at targets. </p><p></p><p>A person should be aware bullet performance with any weapon they carry. I think a lot of the time people who, with the best of attentions, argue for our 2nd amendment rights are not very knowledgeable about weapon performance. The same goes for those who argue against those rights. We need to remember/understand that once our projectile reaches its target it doesnt just stop. Depending on what you are shooting and the bullet its self, performance varies. If you have hunted, you know that you can shoot a animal at 150 to 200 yards and get a clean pass through. Thant bullet goes somewhere. If you are at Ken's Pizza and some dirt bag comes in threatening to shoot some one, you wouldnt want to pull up your 30'06 and shoot through him and also kill Grand ma in the bathroom stall behind the Frogger machine.</p><p></p><p>I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. I believe it was written and ratified by wise men with the best interest of the Nation in mind. I also believe that if these same wise men would not consider the censorship of Porn from public broadcast as unconstitutional. When the constitution was written public decency and moral values carried more weight than personal wealth.</p><p></p><p>Jason</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Badley, post: 1034338, member: 10852"] I have a question for yall, why do you feel the need to carry? Is it for personal protection, intimidation, or assault? When Im speaking of carry, I am talking about on your person. My opinion on this matter is that you should be able to carry, concealed or open. I myself carry for personal protection. If I am in a situation that causes me to have to use my weapon, I plan on using my weapon to neutralize the situation and/or removing my self from it. I dont feel I need a long gun or shot gun to do this. I dont plan on going on the offensive. My opinion on what a person can carry varies. Shot guns, Rifles, "assault weapons" (Pretty much any thing thats fully automatic) really dont have a place in "on person" carry. Should you be able to have access to these weapons? Sure, although from personal experience, fully automatic weapons are better for creating noise and distraction, than they are for identifying a target and removing that target. And my experience is not shooting at a individuals of course, just shooting at targets. A person should be aware bullet performance with any weapon they carry. I think a lot of the time people who, with the best of attentions, argue for our 2nd amendment rights are not very knowledgeable about weapon performance. The same goes for those who argue against those rights. We need to remember/understand that once our projectile reaches its target it doesnt just stop. Depending on what you are shooting and the bullet its self, performance varies. If you have hunted, you know that you can shoot a animal at 150 to 200 yards and get a clean pass through. Thant bullet goes somewhere. If you are at Ken's Pizza and some dirt bag comes in threatening to shoot some one, you wouldnt want to pull up your 30'06 and shoot through him and also kill Grand ma in the bathroom stall behind the Frogger machine. I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. I believe it was written and ratified by wise men with the best interest of the Nation in mind. I also believe that if these same wise men would not consider the censorship of Porn from public broadcast as unconstitutional. When the constitution was written public decency and moral values carried more weight than personal wealth. Jason [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Open Carry poll
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom