Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Optics suggestions for Ruger American 300blk
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 2883454" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>Given the vast difference in ballistics and trajectory between subs and supers, for .300blk it might be better to get a generic mil-dot or something. </p><p></p><p>From what I've found, .22HV and .300blk subs are "close". I have a .22 BDC Bushnell that I am going to test with my .300blk. Don't know when, but someday.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 2883454, member: 423"] Given the vast difference in ballistics and trajectory between subs and supers, for .300blk it might be better to get a generic mil-dot or something. From what I've found, .22HV and .300blk subs are "close". I have a .22 BDC Bushnell that I am going to test with my .300blk. Don't know when, but someday. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Optics suggestions for Ruger American 300blk
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom