Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Our Guns are at risk
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seth247" data-source="post: 1613896" data-attributes="member: 12010"><p>Yes but remember the second amendment isn't the only part of the constitution. </p><p></p><p>For instance. If I was to kill someone with a handgun in cold blood, that WOULD be illegal under the constitution, but not in relation the the gun. I would not be guilty of a firearm homicide, simply a homicide, since I would have violated said persons Right to Life.(capitalized on purpose) The firearm would not enter into the matter. So while it's true that the second amendment doesn't address the mis-use of the Arm, other parts of the constitution do address the consequences of that mis-use. </p><p></p><p>This is the reason I believe the American constitution is one of the most inspired and well thought out pieces of governmental planning ever recorded. A person has the right do whatever they please, as long as the activity does not violate those same rights of another person. </p><p></p><p>Civilization literally cannot be any more free than that and still be civilization. </p><p></p><p>Of course, that's all assuming we lived in an era where lawmakers payed attention to the WORD of the constitution and not simply what they can fool the Mob into believing it means.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seth247, post: 1613896, member: 12010"] Yes but remember the second amendment isn't the only part of the constitution. For instance. If I was to kill someone with a handgun in cold blood, that WOULD be illegal under the constitution, but not in relation the the gun. I would not be guilty of a firearm homicide, simply a homicide, since I would have violated said persons Right to Life.(capitalized on purpose) The firearm would not enter into the matter. So while it's true that the second amendment doesn't address the mis-use of the Arm, other parts of the constitution do address the consequences of that mis-use. This is the reason I believe the American constitution is one of the most inspired and well thought out pieces of governmental planning ever recorded. A person has the right do whatever they please, as long as the activity does not violate those same rights of another person. Civilization literally cannot be any more free than that and still be civilization. Of course, that's all assuming we lived in an era where lawmakers payed attention to the WORD of the constitution and not simply what they can fool the Mob into believing it means. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Our Guns are at risk
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom