Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="henschman" data-source="post: 2097293" data-attributes="member: 4235"><p>Yeah... to me, whether force is justified depends on whether someone's rights were violated.  If they actually made a transfer in the rights to certain property and one party decides to be an indian giver, I'd say force is warranted.  If it is just them making a promise to give something in the future, I don't think any right to the property was transferred, and it isn't right to force them to deliver.  Since I'm a lawyer, I better add that this is just my personal opinion on the nature of rights/force, and it doesn't have anything to do with what the law says about this type of situation.  We all know that the law countenances a lot of initiation of force when no rights were violated, and prohibits a lot of force when rights are violated.</p></blockquote><p></p>