Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Pass a law please.....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 2342125" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>No, it's not fine. Those are protected groups under U.S. laws...SDA permit holders are not a "protected group".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree in part...my point is where does the patron's responsibility begin and end in a free-will environment? If you approach an establishment and see a "no guns" sign and then <em>choose</em> to go back to your vehicle, disarm, and enter the establishment anyway, why should the business owner be liable for a situation that they didn't create (the criminal act) but you <em>willingly</em> exposed yourself to? </p><p></p><p>While the business owner may have limited your options to respond to a threat (limited, not removed entirely), the business owner did not create the situation that resulted in the criminal act taking place...unless you have some statistics that prove crime is more likely to happen in a business that prohibits concealed carry (real statistics, not anecdotes).</p><p></p><p>We need less laws and regulation of business. Not more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 2342125, member: 42"] No, it's not fine. Those are protected groups under U.S. laws...SDA permit holders are not a "protected group". I agree in part...my point is where does the patron's responsibility begin and end in a free-will environment? If you approach an establishment and see a "no guns" sign and then [I]choose[/I] to go back to your vehicle, disarm, and enter the establishment anyway, why should the business owner be liable for a situation that they didn't create (the criminal act) but you [I]willingly[/I] exposed yourself to? While the business owner may have limited your options to respond to a threat (limited, not removed entirely), the business owner did not create the situation that resulted in the criminal act taking place...unless you have some statistics that prove crime is more likely to happen in a business that prohibits concealed carry (real statistics, not anecdotes). We need less laws and regulation of business. Not more. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Pass a law please.....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom