Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Pass a law please.....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 2353092" data-attributes="member: 26737"><p>I've read them, and I still can't figure out how you got from "an entity should be able to do something stupid" to "'negroes' aren't citizens" and "you won't be allowing Colion Noir in your place of business."</p><p></p><p>This discussion is not about whether or not a business should be discriminating against any particular group, it's about who should be making the decision--should it be made by the business and its customers or by the gov't? I think SMS, TedKennedy, and I have all been clear that hanging a sign saying "No <insert group here> allowed" is a stupid decision (for the reasons you keep bringing up), but we think the decision should be made by the business owner, not by the gov't. Quite frankly, market pressure would be much more efficient at resolving the issue than the gov't could ever be--and it wouldn't cost the taxpayers a dime, to boot.</p><p></p><p>Let's look at this another way. A business is a private entity operating on private property, and the gov't tells them "you can't prohibit <insert group here> from entering your property." When you're at home, you are a private entity on private property--should the gov't be able to tell you that you can't prohibit <insert group here> from coming onto your property or entering your home?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 2353092, member: 26737"] I've read them, and I still can't figure out how you got from "an entity should be able to do something stupid" to "'negroes' aren't citizens" and "you won't be allowing Colion Noir in your place of business." This discussion is not about whether or not a business should be discriminating against any particular group, it's about who should be making the decision--should it be made by the business and its customers or by the gov't? I think SMS, TedKennedy, and I have all been clear that hanging a sign saying "No <insert group here> allowed" is a stupid decision (for the reasons you keep bringing up), but we think the decision should be made by the business owner, not by the gov't. Quite frankly, market pressure would be much more efficient at resolving the issue than the gov't could ever be--and it wouldn't cost the taxpayers a dime, to boot. Let's look at this another way. A business is a private entity operating on private property, and the gov't tells them "you can't prohibit <insert group here> from entering your property." When you're at home, you are a private entity on private property--should the gov't be able to tell you that you can't prohibit <insert group here> from coming onto your property or entering your home? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Pass a law please.....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom