Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Philosophical question about CCW
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1shot(bob)" data-source="post: 1329006" data-attributes="member: 1657"><p>So I have to ask this then: is question #1 a problem? Has that happened lately?</p><p>Same question for your question #2? I mean brandishing as in the real definition of brandishing, not some shirt tail flapping ion the breeze and exposing accidentally.</p><p>Why do we want to discourage people from carrying by threatening punishment if they do it wrong? The more people that carry, the safer we all are. It puts the perps at ill ease, which slows them down. Statistics seem to prove that.</p><p>Now if you shoot someone because you acted/reacted incorrectly, you pay the piper, sure.</p><p>MB's article had some good points, but some times we seem to be trying to fix problems that don't really exist.</p><p>I'm all for proper training. People should have the ability to handle their weapon of choice, but does training at a range actually prepare us to face down a guy with intent to do us bodily harm? You may be able to hit the steel 9 out of 10 times, but could you do the same if the steel was shooting back?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1shot(bob), post: 1329006, member: 1657"] So I have to ask this then: is question #1 a problem? Has that happened lately? Same question for your question #2? I mean brandishing as in the real definition of brandishing, not some shirt tail flapping ion the breeze and exposing accidentally. Why do we want to discourage people from carrying by threatening punishment if they do it wrong? The more people that carry, the safer we all are. It puts the perps at ill ease, which slows them down. Statistics seem to prove that. Now if you shoot someone because you acted/reacted incorrectly, you pay the piper, sure. MB's article had some good points, but some times we seem to be trying to fix problems that don't really exist. I'm all for proper training. People should have the ability to handle their weapon of choice, but does training at a range actually prepare us to face down a guy with intent to do us bodily harm? You may be able to hit the steel 9 out of 10 times, but could you do the same if the steel was shooting back? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Philosophical question about CCW
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom