Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Pistol Brace "rules" signed by AG today
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GorillaG" data-source="post: 3966775" data-attributes="member: 49083"><p>LOL they have TEAMS of lawyers writing these "rules" for literally YEARS which in fact illegally have the force of law, and they STILL they can't get it right or even logical. I'd love to know the difference between "removing a brace" and "permanently removing a brace". If I give the brace away to someone who only owns rifles, is it now removed or permanently removed? If I have no brace I cant really shoulder a buffer tube unless you want to be so absurd that you can technically shoulder a regular sized pistol. It would be very hard to shoulder a regular pistol and actually fire it but I guess it COULD be done. So I guess ALL pistols can technically be shouldered so are they now illegal too? If I take off the brace but not the buffer tube is that sufficient? If I take off the buffer tube AND the brace it now can't function at all but if I buy a new buffer tube and brace then it's not "permanently" removed I guess, right? So it sounds like totally destroying the gun or turning it in is the ONLY way to meet the standard they set, correct? Cluster Foxtrot squared...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GorillaG, post: 3966775, member: 49083"] LOL they have TEAMS of lawyers writing these "rules" for literally YEARS which in fact illegally have the force of law, and they STILL they can't get it right or even logical. I'd love to know the difference between "removing a brace" and "permanently removing a brace". If I give the brace away to someone who only owns rifles, is it now removed or permanently removed? If I have no brace I cant really shoulder a buffer tube unless you want to be so absurd that you can technically shoulder a regular sized pistol. It would be very hard to shoulder a regular pistol and actually fire it but I guess it COULD be done. So I guess ALL pistols can technically be shouldered so are they now illegal too? If I take off the brace but not the buffer tube is that sufficient? If I take off the buffer tube AND the brace it now can't function at all but if I buy a new buffer tube and brace then it's not "permanently" removed I guess, right? So it sounds like totally destroying the gun or turning it in is the ONLY way to meet the standard they set, correct? Cluster Foxtrot squared... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Pistol Brace "rules" signed by AG today
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom