Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="madmax" data-source="post: 74505" data-attributes="member: 835">Hey Everyone,First time poster here. This particular issue really has me bugged.&nbsp; I&#039;ve read through all the posts in the link, and all the posts in this thread as well.&nbsp;&nbsp; The LEO on the other site seems convinced that carrying in a place with a sign that says &quot;no firearms&quot; is a crime and punishable as a misdemeanor yet:1.&nbsp; I see no provision in the statute indicating any specifics of what a business owner must do in order to alert folks that no weapons are allowed on his/her premises. 2. Without such specifics,&nbsp; it would seem that anyone could reasonably and innocently fail to be aware that the owner has made any such prohibition.&nbsp; (The sign wasn&#039;t obvious, you were preoccupied on entry into the business, etc.)&nbsp; I really think this issue needs to be addressed and clarified with some kind of explicit ammendments to the statute.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="madmax, post: 74505, member: 835"] Hey Everyone, First time poster here. This particular issue really has me bugged. I've read through all the posts in the link, and all the posts in this thread as well. The LEO on the other site seems convinced that carrying in a place with a sign that says "no firearms" is a crime and punishable as a misdemeanor yet: 1. I see no provision in the statute indicating any specifics of what a business owner must do in order to alert folks that no weapons are allowed on his/her premises. 2. Without such specifics, it would seem that anyone could reasonably and innocently fail to be aware that the owner has made any such prohibition. (The sign wasn't obvious, you were preoccupied on entry into the business, etc.) I really think this issue needs to be addressed and clarified with some kind of explicit ammendments to the statute. [/QUOTE]

Verification