Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1779321" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Natural hearing is superior to suppressed hearing. I challenge you to prove otherwise. A suppressor is absolutely a superior method to prevent hearing damage while retaining full, directional hearing in the field. In many instances, locating game is done initially through sound. Reducing the ability to detect and locate game noise will effectively reduce the success rate.</p><p></p><p>What you think and the game wardens think is irrelevant to my experience when hunting. You're not there, I am. I have no issues with you or them not using a can. I do have an issue with you or them saying I shouldn't be able to, for no other reason that your own biases. As a tax stamp holder, I am more thoroughly vetted than you with your simple hunting license. The federal government has already deemed me to be responsible enough to legally use a suppressor, and I have the paperwork to prove it. Who are you or the game wardens to assume I'm a criminal or have criminal tendencies, just because I want to hunt with one?</p><p></p><p>Please answer this: Do you always use hearing protection when hunting? Do you require your children to always use hearing protection when hunting?</p><p></p><p>PS: Please use a spell check if you have one available. There are over 15 grammatical/typographical errors in your post, which makes it difficult to read. Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1779321, member: 1132"] Natural hearing is superior to suppressed hearing. I challenge you to prove otherwise. A suppressor is absolutely a superior method to prevent hearing damage while retaining full, directional hearing in the field. In many instances, locating game is done initially through sound. Reducing the ability to detect and locate game noise will effectively reduce the success rate. What you think and the game wardens think is irrelevant to my experience when hunting. You're not there, I am. I have no issues with you or them not using a can. I do have an issue with you or them saying I shouldn't be able to, for no other reason that your own biases. As a tax stamp holder, I am more thoroughly vetted than you with your simple hunting license. The federal government has already deemed me to be responsible enough to legally use a suppressor, and I have the paperwork to prove it. Who are you or the game wardens to assume I'm a criminal or have criminal tendencies, just because I want to hunt with one? Please answer this: Do you always use hearing protection when hunting? Do you require your children to always use hearing protection when hunting? PS: Please use a spell check if you have one available. There are over 15 grammatical/typographical errors in your post, which makes it difficult to read. Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom