Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rlt7272" data-source="post: 1779372" data-attributes="member: 435"><p>Wow, a hunting lesson and an english lesson all in one post. Thank you. </p><p></p><p>My simple hunting license is all that my state says I need to take game, as long as I follow the rules set out by the state. Having a tax stamp does not make you any better of a hunter or sportsman than me. It only means that you decided to allow the goverment to dig just a little deeper in your life so that you can have a suppressor. </p><p></p><p>Hearing loss is a red herring argument used to distract from the underlying basis of your reason for wanting to be able to use supressors. Those of you who have them want to use them, that is it. I do not use hearing protection while hunting. I also do not use hearing protection while mowing the grass or operating power tools. Do you have an extra muffler on your mower or a super quiet skill saw? The risk of hearing loss is part of the hobby. That risk can be lessened with available hearing protection.</p><p></p><p>I have nothing againt supressor ownership, you guys paid your money and thats cool. I do have an opinion regarding their use for hunting. You guys want to use them because you think they will save your hearing and because everyone around us gets to (strong argument by the way). I do not agree and I have not seen anything yet that would change my opinion (excuse me, my grammatically/typographically incorrect opinion).</p><p></p><p>Oh, as for your tax stamp and being more vetted than me, how long of a security clearing process do you think those secret service members who got busted in Columbia went thru to get their clearance? Probably just as involved as your tax stamp approval process but that really didnt do anything to keep the knucklehead from popping up in them. Forgive me if I do not put a lot of weight in your extra tax stamp holder status.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rlt7272, post: 1779372, member: 435"] Wow, a hunting lesson and an english lesson all in one post. Thank you. My simple hunting license is all that my state says I need to take game, as long as I follow the rules set out by the state. Having a tax stamp does not make you any better of a hunter or sportsman than me. It only means that you decided to allow the goverment to dig just a little deeper in your life so that you can have a suppressor. Hearing loss is a red herring argument used to distract from the underlying basis of your reason for wanting to be able to use supressors. Those of you who have them want to use them, that is it. I do not use hearing protection while hunting. I also do not use hearing protection while mowing the grass or operating power tools. Do you have an extra muffler on your mower or a super quiet skill saw? The risk of hearing loss is part of the hobby. That risk can be lessened with available hearing protection. I have nothing againt supressor ownership, you guys paid your money and thats cool. I do have an opinion regarding their use for hunting. You guys want to use them because you think they will save your hearing and because everyone around us gets to (strong argument by the way). I do not agree and I have not seen anything yet that would change my opinion (excuse me, my grammatically/typographically incorrect opinion). Oh, as for your tax stamp and being more vetted than me, how long of a security clearing process do you think those secret service members who got busted in Columbia went thru to get their clearance? Probably just as involved as your tax stamp approval process but that really didnt do anything to keep the knucklehead from popping up in them. Forgive me if I do not put a lot of weight in your extra tax stamp holder status. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom