Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rlt7272" data-source="post: 1779664" data-attributes="member: 435"><p>I'm anti gun? So the game wardens who dont want them used during hunting are anti gun too, correct? If Tony Clark's statement as reported here by newsok.com is true then the game warden associaion of oklahoma is also antigun. </p><p></p><p>I have an opinion (unpopular as it may be) and those of you that say change is needed have only provided one reason for change that cannot be solved with the tools currently available. </p><p></p><p>Saying I am anti gun because I dont like it is like saying I am anti American because I disagree with the Presdient.</p><p></p><p>I had no doubt that my adverse opition on this issue would cause a stir, however, I will match each of your unsupported opinions on this issue with one of my own.</p><p></p><p>Hearing loss prevention ... electronic ear protection amazon.com can fix you up</p><p>Beacuse it should be our right ... well you got me there, but if it was truly your right to own one why do you have to pay extra for that right (tax stamp) how about taking this energy to the federal goverment and getting that silly tax taken off</p><p>Because the neigbors complained ... archery season is much longer and all you need is some whiskers and some mole skin to quiet that equipment.</p><p></p><p>You think you need and want to use supressors while hunting and I think you dont.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rlt7272, post: 1779664, member: 435"] I'm anti gun? So the game wardens who dont want them used during hunting are anti gun too, correct? If Tony Clark's statement as reported here by newsok.com is true then the game warden associaion of oklahoma is also antigun. I have an opinion (unpopular as it may be) and those of you that say change is needed have only provided one reason for change that cannot be solved with the tools currently available. Saying I am anti gun because I dont like it is like saying I am anti American because I disagree with the Presdient. I had no doubt that my adverse opition on this issue would cause a stir, however, I will match each of your unsupported opinions on this issue with one of my own. Hearing loss prevention ... electronic ear protection amazon.com can fix you up Beacuse it should be our right ... well you got me there, but if it was truly your right to own one why do you have to pay extra for that right (tax stamp) how about taking this energy to the federal goverment and getting that silly tax taken off Because the neigbors complained ... archery season is much longer and all you need is some whiskers and some mole skin to quiet that equipment. You think you need and want to use supressors while hunting and I think you dont. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom