Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Poll: Curious how many will agree with a statement I found in an OP-ED
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMFIC" data-source="post: 2109718" data-attributes="member: 7539"><p>I'd like to ask how many firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens prevent or deter murders upon themselves or their loved ones. I am confident that this number is significantly higher than the murder rate.</p><p></p><p>I'll go one step further and also ask how many firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens prevent or deter all forms of crime. I am equally confident that this number is significantly higher than the gun crime rate.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't really matter what the question is or how it's framed though... the bottom line is ALWAYS this: Freedom is more important than any false sense of security that those who would deny our gun rights may gain over restrictions of any kind. Maintaining our freedoms may in fact require a civil war someday, but to begin the argument stating that we should trade one for the other is just ridiculous.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps the question that should be asked is of those who would like to trample the second amendment... ask them if they would be willing to trade a gun-free America for a Civil War?</p><p></p><p><em>- I am in favor of civil war if accompanied by a gun free America.</em></p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p><em>- I am against civil war even if it means America will not be gun free.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMFIC, post: 2109718, member: 7539"] I'd like to ask how many firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens prevent or deter murders upon themselves or their loved ones. I am confident that this number is significantly higher than the murder rate. I'll go one step further and also ask how many firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens prevent or deter all forms of crime. I am equally confident that this number is significantly higher than the gun crime rate. It doesn't really matter what the question is or how it's framed though... the bottom line is ALWAYS this: Freedom is more important than any false sense of security that those who would deny our gun rights may gain over restrictions of any kind. Maintaining our freedoms may in fact require a civil war someday, but to begin the argument stating that we should trade one for the other is just ridiculous. Perhaps the question that should be asked is of those who would like to trample the second amendment... ask them if they would be willing to trade a gun-free America for a Civil War? [I]- I am in favor of civil war if accompanied by a gun free America.[/I] or [I]- I am against civil war even if it means America will not be gun free.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Poll: Curious how many will agree with a statement I found in an OP-ED
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom