Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Poll: Marijuana Law Reform
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 2480033" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>If going through the massive expenditure (likely $2-$3/signature would need to be raised on average to be expended on professional petitioners and marketing - enough to run a competitive gubernatorial candidate) of an initiative for an amendment to the state constitution, why not model this after Colorado's amendment, or even perhaps similar to Oklahoma's tobacco growing laws?</p><p></p><p>I personally cannot support this initiative because it further limits freedom. It also places a tax for medical access to marijuana in addition to the marijuana tax that is already on the books. It also places an undue financial burden on those who those who would like to grow, transport, or dispense marijuana. The proposed regulations on growers' reporting is also unreasonably restrictive. By restricting who can have involvement in a marijuana-related business within Oklahoma to only residents of the state of Oklahoma, this severely limits access to capital and other business resources.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 2480033, member: 5151"] If going through the massive expenditure (likely $2-$3/signature would need to be raised on average to be expended on professional petitioners and marketing - enough to run a competitive gubernatorial candidate) of an initiative for an amendment to the state constitution, why not model this after Colorado's amendment, or even perhaps similar to Oklahoma's tobacco growing laws? I personally cannot support this initiative because it further limits freedom. It also places a tax for medical access to marijuana in addition to the marijuana tax that is already on the books. It also places an undue financial burden on those who those who would like to grow, transport, or dispense marijuana. The proposed regulations on growers' reporting is also unreasonably restrictive. By restricting who can have involvement in a marijuana-related business within Oklahoma to only residents of the state of Oklahoma, this severely limits access to capital and other business resources. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Poll: Marijuana Law Reform
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom