Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Popvox
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phildo64" data-source="post: 2045484" data-attributes="member: 10653"><p>Same here. Here's my comment!</p><p></p><p>I oppose Sen. Feinstein's New Version of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban because...After time spend in Afghanistan and in combat I understand that some if not most bad guys don't turn tale and run after one shot is fired. And if there is one bad guy there is often more. Guns are NOT magic death rays that obliterate all life that's in front of them. Ive fired my weapon and hit individuals in Astan just to watch them take the hit and continue firing. 10 round magazines are not only a total insult to the manufactures of these weapons they SEVERELY limit the capability of a firearm in an active life and death situation. The founding fathers believed in the right to bear arms as individuals and so does the Supreme Court. Anyone that believe these "justified limitations" wouldn't hinder anyone needs to talk to a vet or watch some shoot out videos. They need to enlighten themselves to reality and welcome themselves to the real world. A firearm isn't a guarantee in the hands of a good guy but its a chance and option that an unarmed individual stands a chance of making it out alive and if not alive at least the bad guy will have to deal with them before harming another innocent life. Phil S.</p><p></p><p>BOOM!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phildo64, post: 2045484, member: 10653"] Same here. Here's my comment! I oppose Sen. Feinstein's New Version of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban because...After time spend in Afghanistan and in combat I understand that some if not most bad guys don't turn tale and run after one shot is fired. And if there is one bad guy there is often more. Guns are NOT magic death rays that obliterate all life that's in front of them. Ive fired my weapon and hit individuals in Astan just to watch them take the hit and continue firing. 10 round magazines are not only a total insult to the manufactures of these weapons they SEVERELY limit the capability of a firearm in an active life and death situation. The founding fathers believed in the right to bear arms as individuals and so does the Supreme Court. Anyone that believe these "justified limitations" wouldn't hinder anyone needs to talk to a vet or watch some shoot out videos. They need to enlighten themselves to reality and welcome themselves to the real world. A firearm isn't a guarantee in the hands of a good guy but its a chance and option that an unarmed individual stands a chance of making it out alive and if not alive at least the bad guy will have to deal with them before harming another innocent life. Phil S. BOOM! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Popvox
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
