Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 2064204" data-attributes="member: 239">Emphasis mineExcept for one thing. When Federal and State law conflict the constitution states Federal law will take precedence. I&#039;d say it was that simple but it really isn&#039;t. The 10th is pretty clear that powers not specifically delegated to the Feds are reserved to the states. Gun law was not delegated to the feds in any way shape or means except for one thing: The 2nd demands that the feds not infring a citizen&#039;s RKBA.Which means that someone&#039;s got to be a test case and the case must end up in SCOTUS and be ruled on based on the 10th. IMO SCOTUS is a bunch of status quo anti boat rockers employed by the feds who never ever give power grabbed by the feds back to the states (at least not that I&#039;m aware of).So as another poster mentioned any law enacted as mentioned by the OP will be little more than symbolic.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 2064204, member: 239"] [I]Emphasis mine[/I] Except for one thing. When Federal and State law conflict the constitution states Federal law will take precedence. I'd say it was that simple but it really isn't. The 10th is pretty clear that powers not specifically delegated to the Feds are reserved to the states. Gun law was not delegated to the feds in any way shape or means except for one thing: The 2nd demands that the feds not infring a citizen's RKBA. Which means that someone's got to be a test case and the case must end up in SCOTUS and be ruled on based on the 10th. IMO SCOTUS is a bunch of status quo anti boat rockers employed by the feds who never ever give power grabbed by the feds back to the states (at least not that I'm aware of). So as another poster mentioned any law enacted as mentioned by the OP will be little more than symbolic. [/QUOTE]

Verification