Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AllOut" data-source="post: 1253398" data-attributes="member: 12099">you guys are arguing a losing battle on the b&amp;c and p&amp;y scoring systems there is a long line and history of tradtion your fighting against. i dont like deductions either but the way they measure a trophy isnt just on size but also how perfect it is, which is very understandible. as for dennis&#039; deer not being scorable is just plain bs and untrue. all racks are scorable!as for the weight idea, thats just rediculous. deer hold body weight due to the need to hold body teperature and the deer down south obviously dont need it cause its 90deg year round and thats also why canada has 300+ lb deer cause it freak&#039;n cold!the weight is a different idea and i have seen ideas similar in water displacement measuring but that wouldnt account for inside spread now the way we measure accounts for heigth + width + circumfrence which is all u really need to be even/fair or whatever u want to call it</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AllOut, post: 1253398, member: 12099"] you guys are arguing a losing battle on the b&c and p&y scoring systems there is a long line and history of tradtion your fighting against. i dont like deductions either but the way they measure a trophy isnt just on size but also how perfect it is, which is very understandible. as for dennis' deer not being scorable is just plain bs and untrue. all racks are scorable! as for the weight idea, thats just rediculous. deer hold body weight due to the need to hold body teperature and the deer down south obviously dont need it cause its 90deg year round and thats also why canada has 300+ lb deer cause it freak'n cold! the weight is a different idea and i have seen ideas similar in water displacement measuring but that wouldnt account for inside spread now the way we measure accounts for heigth + width + circumfrence which is all u really need to be even/fair or whatever u want to call it [/QUOTE]

Verification