Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Firearm Training
Principle Three: Aggressiveness
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smokeyokc" data-source="post: 1041338" data-attributes="member: 4231"><p>Mike first let me say I respect you as well and have enjoyed your opinions.</p><p></p><p>Question 1. I think simply put if you are required to act you can be violent without anger. If you were attacked by some one unarmed and you are unarmed would you strike back. I think you would. I would to and I would strike back to inflict enough damage to end the conflict hopefully. That would be violent.</p><p></p><p>Question 2. No I will not answer this on an internet forum for obvious reasons and it is not germane to the discussion. </p><p></p><p>Your last statement "I think you may be equating aggressiveness with violence" by definition they are not to far apart.</p><p></p><p>Violence is the expression of physical or verbal force against self or other, compelling action against one's will on pain of being hurt.</p><p></p><p>Aggression (also called combativeness) refers to behavior between members of the same species that is intended to cause pain or harm. Predatory or defensive behavior between members of different species is not normally considered "aggression." Aggression takes a variety of forms among humans and can be physical, mental, or verbal.</p><p></p><p>Again just my two cents FWIW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smokeyokc, post: 1041338, member: 4231"] Mike first let me say I respect you as well and have enjoyed your opinions. Question 1. I think simply put if you are required to act you can be violent without anger. If you were attacked by some one unarmed and you are unarmed would you strike back. I think you would. I would to and I would strike back to inflict enough damage to end the conflict hopefully. That would be violent. Question 2. No I will not answer this on an internet forum for obvious reasons and it is not germane to the discussion. Your last statement "I think you may be equating aggressiveness with violence" by definition they are not to far apart. Violence is the expression of physical or verbal force against self or other, compelling action against one's will on pain of being hurt. Aggression (also called combativeness) refers to behavior between members of the same species that is intended to cause pain or harm. Predatory or defensive behavior between members of different species is not normally considered "aggression." Aggression takes a variety of forms among humans and can be physical, mental, or verbal. Again just my two cents FWIW. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Firearm Training
Principle Three: Aggressiveness
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom