Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Pro-Gun vs Anti-Gun
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="michaelnc4444" data-source="post: 2027007" data-attributes="member: 26525"><p>I think it is more than that. The anti-gun crowd views the purpose of guns to kill, therefore they believe "assault rifles" are super duper killing machines. The purpose of a gun is not to kill. Is that a consequence of using one? More often than not, yes... The purpose though is one of three things.</p><p></p><p>1) Hunting, not sport hunting, hunting to feed your family or yourself.</p><p>2) Sport, target shooting, clays, hunting for sport...</p><p>3) DEFENSE, defense against criminals, terrorists, and most importantly, tyrants.</p><p></p><p>In addition to this, most of them truly fail to understand the 2nd Amendment. The media has them convinced that the 2nd is for hunting and defense against muggers... These things are afterthoughts, as I said above, defense against the tyrants was the first and foremost reason for this right. </p><p></p><p>The first 10 Amendments were obviously the ones they felt were the most important. The 1st says you have the right to be free, the 2nd says you have the right to defend that freedom. How is this hard for them to understand?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="michaelnc4444, post: 2027007, member: 26525"] I think it is more than that. The anti-gun crowd views the purpose of guns to kill, therefore they believe "assault rifles" are super duper killing machines. The purpose of a gun is not to kill. Is that a consequence of using one? More often than not, yes... The purpose though is one of three things. 1) Hunting, not sport hunting, hunting to feed your family or yourself. 2) Sport, target shooting, clays, hunting for sport... 3) DEFENSE, defense against criminals, terrorists, and most importantly, tyrants. In addition to this, most of them truly fail to understand the 2nd Amendment. The media has them convinced that the 2nd is for hunting and defense against muggers... These things are afterthoughts, as I said above, defense against the tyrants was the first and foremost reason for this right. The first 10 Amendments were obviously the ones they felt were the most important. The 1st says you have the right to be free, the 2nd says you have the right to defend that freedom. How is this hard for them to understand? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Pro-Gun vs Anti-Gun
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom