Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Probably Been Asked Before, but...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diggler1833" data-source="post: 3929321" data-attributes="member: 48072"><p>Having avoided them like the plague, I'm going to regurgitate the generalized complaints of owners...so please take this as only an educated opinion:</p><p></p><p>Thin barrels that had more pressure applied at the gas block than other designs (eg. ARs). Add a wood or plastic stock that isn't precisely fitted, and you have multiple contact points that really screw with the harmonics of any barrel - let alone a pencil barrel...especially a wood stock that expands and contracts with the environment. </p><p></p><p>I *heard* the older barrels were button rifled poorly, and had a lot of stress relief that caused POI shift once they heated up. I guess their CHF process helped alleviate some of the problem, and this is why they are regarded as 2-4 MOA rifles now as opposed to minute of pie plate. Again, I have no experience here.</p><p></p><p>Top it off with crappy iron sights and a trigger that wasn't great (I have fired a couple rounds through one), and you have a recipe for disappointment if you are expecting long range varmint accuracy. </p><p></p><p>But the rifles weren't designed for that purpose though.</p><p></p><p>Just my .02.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diggler1833, post: 3929321, member: 48072"] Having avoided them like the plague, I'm going to regurgitate the generalized complaints of owners...so please take this as only an educated opinion: Thin barrels that had more pressure applied at the gas block than other designs (eg. ARs). Add a wood or plastic stock that isn't precisely fitted, and you have multiple contact points that really screw with the harmonics of any barrel - let alone a pencil barrel...especially a wood stock that expands and contracts with the environment. I *heard* the older barrels were button rifled poorly, and had a lot of stress relief that caused POI shift once they heated up. I guess their CHF process helped alleviate some of the problem, and this is why they are regarded as 2-4 MOA rifles now as opposed to minute of pie plate. Again, I have no experience here. Top it off with crappy iron sights and a trigger that wasn't great (I have fired a couple rounds through one), and you have a recipe for disappointment if you are expecting long range varmint accuracy. But the rifles weren't designed for that purpose though. Just my .02. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Probably Been Asked Before, but...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom