Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Proposal of AR confiscation in California
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dutchwrangler" data-source="post: 2100496" data-attributes="member: 4650"><p>Everything said in the quote above before the word <span style="color: #FF0000"><strong><span style="font-size: 10px">But</span></strong></span> is negated by that three letter word. Each and every time someone says "but", they could've saved oxygen by not uttering what precedes it and just go with the latter part... which is what they're really thinking.</p><p></p><p>Thus Steinberg is really saying...</p><p></p><p>"We don't respect the Second Amendment. Loopholes in California's tough gun laws are not tough enough and have been exploited too long . We the government are going to disarm the people. And by this action the people will serve us, instead of us theoretically serving the people."</p><p></p><p>Naturally many lives will be lost as government employees descend in groups to disarm those who value freedom. Don't know about many on this forum, but I don't fear petty criminals. At best they are a nuisance. We lowly people can handle criminals for the most part without the help of government troops. Government en masse seeking to control our lives... different story that requires we be armed with superior arms to beat them into submission so they remember who the masters truly are.</p><p></p><p>Pro-2A arms owners and golf pros in California really ought to abandon that sinking ship while they can.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dutchwrangler, post: 2100496, member: 4650"] Everything said in the quote above before the word [COLOR="#FF0000"][B][SIZE=2]But[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] is negated by that three letter word. Each and every time someone says "but", they could've saved oxygen by not uttering what precedes it and just go with the latter part... which is what they're really thinking. Thus Steinberg is really saying... "We don't respect the Second Amendment. Loopholes in California's tough gun laws are not tough enough and have been exploited too long . We the government are going to disarm the people. And by this action the people will serve us, instead of us theoretically serving the people." Naturally many lives will be lost as government employees descend in groups to disarm those who value freedom. Don't know about many on this forum, but I don't fear petty criminals. At best they are a nuisance. We lowly people can handle criminals for the most part without the help of government troops. Government en masse seeking to control our lives... different story that requires we be armed with superior arms to beat them into submission so they remember who the masters truly are. Pro-2A arms owners and golf pros in California really ought to abandon that sinking ship while they can. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Proposal of AR confiscation in California
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
