Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Question...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mad Professor" data-source="post: 3556433" data-attributes="member: 5316"><p>Most that are getting into reloading now to save money are being disappointed. </p><p></p><p>Lots of things are needed to do it right, but that doesn’t mean progressive presses and such to increase volume. </p><p>Accurate Scales</p><p>Case gauge</p><p>Calipers</p><p>Swage or other primer pocket tools. </p><p>Lots of other small things that just add up. </p><p>The default die set you pick might not be optimal and you might need another die or two to get the desired results </p><p>Chronograph to verify etc </p><p>Testing and load development might take way more rounds than you think. And getting through the problem solving that many have to endure during the hearing stages. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Being frugal can make it worse. </p><p></p><p>Using jacketed bullets makes things a bit more forgiving, but at a cost.</p><p></p><p>Component cost are MUCH more expensive for small volumes. (1000 or less) </p><p></p><p>I very often run across people using reloaded ammo at the range and in competitions that is pure junk. Feeding issues, accuracy even tumbling bullets, smoke fest, etc because of “saving money”, lack of attention to detail, and skipping steps. </p><p></p><p>Most reloaders tend to leave off some of the costs associated with reloading. Some because of the passion of the hobby. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For the same reason you want to venture down this trail, I believe will be the cause of a less than fully successful endeavor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mad Professor, post: 3556433, member: 5316"] Most that are getting into reloading now to save money are being disappointed. Lots of things are needed to do it right, but that doesn’t mean progressive presses and such to increase volume. Accurate Scales Case gauge Calipers Swage or other primer pocket tools. Lots of other small things that just add up. The default die set you pick might not be optimal and you might need another die or two to get the desired results Chronograph to verify etc Testing and load development might take way more rounds than you think. And getting through the problem solving that many have to endure during the hearing stages. Being frugal can make it worse. Using jacketed bullets makes things a bit more forgiving, but at a cost. Component cost are MUCH more expensive for small volumes. (1000 or less) I very often run across people using reloaded ammo at the range and in competitions that is pure junk. Feeding issues, accuracy even tumbling bullets, smoke fest, etc because of “saving money”, lack of attention to detail, and skipping steps. Most reloaders tend to leave off some of the costs associated with reloading. Some because of the passion of the hobby. For the same reason you want to venture down this trail, I believe will be the cause of a less than fully successful endeavor. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Question...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom