Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Rangel: No Guns For Law-Abiding Constituents But I ‘Deserve–Need’ Police Protection [AUDIO]
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gerhard1" data-source="post: 2886815" data-attributes="member: 5391"><p>This incident with Rangell reminds me of something. Hanoi Jane was an advocate of strict gun-laws, but she and her then-husband had CCW's. When she was asked about this apparent hypocrisy, she is said to have snapped 'That's for other people; not for us.'.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gerhard1, post: 2886815, member: 5391"] This incident with Rangell reminds me of something. Hanoi Jane was an advocate of strict gun-laws, but she and her then-husband had CCW's. When she was asked about this apparent hypocrisy, she is said to have snapped 'That's for other people; not for us.'. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Rangel: No Guns For Law-Abiding Constituents But I ‘Deserve–Need’ Police Protection [AUDIO]
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
